January 2, 2026

Manual therapy is one of the most valuable tools in a therapist’s skill set. CPT code 97140 is frequently used across physical therapy, occupational therapy, and rehabilitation settings, yet it remains a top source of denials, bundling issues, and underpayments.
The reason is simple. Payers do not deny 97140 because it is wrong. They deny it because it is poorly explained. When documentation, timing, and billing logic are not crystal clear, payers default to rejection or reduction.
This guide breaks CPT 97140 down the way payers evaluate it. Not just what it is, but how insurers interpret it, price it, bundle it, and audit it. By the end, you’ll understand how to bill this code confidently without triggering denials or compliance risk.
CPT code 97140 describes manual therapy techniques performed by a licensed therapist using direct physical contact with the patient. This is not a device-based treatment, a passive modality, or a self-directed activity. The therapist’s hands are the intervention.
Manual therapy under 97140 includes techniques such as joint mobilization, manual traction, myofascial release, and manual lymphatic drainage. What ties all of these together is skilled, hands-on manipulation that requires professional judgment and training.
From a payer perspective, this code represents active, skilled intervention, not comfort care. That distinction matters. Insurers are paying for the therapist’s expertise, not just the physical act of touching the patient.
If documentation fails to show skill, assessment, and intent, payers reclassify the service mentally as massage or passive care, and payment stops there.
CPT 97140 sits at a high-risk intersection in therapy billing. It overlaps clinically with other active treatment codes, is time-based, and is frequently billed alongside services such as therapeutic exercise or neuromuscular reeducation.
From a payer’s point of view, this creates three red flags:
Because of these concerns, payers apply edits, bundling rules, and audits to 97140 more aggressively than many other therapy codes. That does not mean the code should be avoided. It means it must be clearly justified.
Practices that bill 97140 successfully are not doing anything special. They are simply making payer logic visible in their documentation.
CPT 97140 is a timed procedure, billed in 15-minute increments. This is where many reimbursement problems begin.
For Medicare and most Medicare-aligned payers, the 8-minute rule applies. This rule determines how many units can be billed based on total documented minutes. The critical point is that time must be exclusive. Minutes spent on manual therapy cannot overlap with time spent on any other service.
Commercial payers may follow the same rule or may require whole 15-minute blocks. This variation is why payer policy review matters. Billing one unit too many—or too few—can change reimbursement or trigger a denial.
From a payer’s perspective, time is money. If time is not documented clearly, the unit count is considered unsupported.
Payers do not require long notes, but they require specific ones. For CPT 97140 to be reimbursed, the documentation must clearly answer three questions.
First, what manual technique was used and where? The note should describe the anatomical area and the method in plain clinical language. Vague statements like “manual therapy performed” leave too much room for interpretation.
Second, how much time was spent on manual therapy alone? Payers want to see a clear separation between manual therapy time and other services. When time is lumped together, payers assume duplication.
Third, why was manual therapy necessary for this patient at this visit? This is a medical necessity. The documentation should connect the technique to functional limitations, pain, mobility restrictions, or progression goals.
When these three elements align, payers rarely challenge the service.
One of the most common reasons CPT 97140 is denied is because it is billed alongside 97110, and the payer decides they are redundant.
Clinically, these services are different. Therapeutic exercise focuses on patient-performed movement to improve strength or endurance. Manual therapy focuses on therapist-applied techniques to address joint or soft tissue restrictions.
Payers, however, only see what is written. If documentation does not clearly differentiate the purpose and timing of each service, they assume overlap.
To be reimbursed together, each service must have:
This is not about using fancy language. It is about showing that the therapist made separate clinical decisions.
Modifiers are how you communicate intent to a payer’s automated system. CPT 97140 often requires modifier 59 or an appropriate X-modifier when billed with other active therapy codes.
The modifier tells the payer that the manual therapy was distinct, separate, and non-duplicative. Without it, the claim may automatically be bundled and reduced to zero.
Some payers prefer more specific X-modifiers, such as XS for a separate structure. Using the correct modifier is not optional—it is how you prevent the payer from assuming redundancy.
Incorrect or missing modifiers are one of the fastest ways to lose reimbursement for 97140, even when the service was fully justified clinically.
Medicare views CPT 97140 as a skilled therapy service, not a passive modality. This distinction carries weight.
To reimburse 97140, Medicare expects:
Medicare does not reimburse manual therapy performed solely for relaxation or comfort. If notes read like massage therapy rather than skilled intervention, payment is at risk.
This is why language matters. Medicare pays for decision-making, not just technique.
Commercial insurers vary significantly. Some mirror Medicare policies. Others impose caps on visits, limits on frequency, or stricter bundling rules.
Many commercial payers reimburse 97140 at a lower rate than exercise codes, making accurate unit billing even more critical. Others deny it outright when billed for certain services, unless the documentation is obvious.
The key takeaway is that commercial reimbursement is policy-driven, not assumption-driven. Practices that rely on “what usually works” are more likely to see inconsistent payment.
Correctly billing CPT code 97140 is less about memorizing rules and more about following a clear sequence. When each step is handled in order, reimbursement becomes predictable. When even one step is skipped, denials usually follow.
This process starts long before the claim is submitted. It begins at the point of care and ends only after payment is reviewed.
Before considering billing, confirm that the service meets the definition of CPT 97140. Manual therapy must be a skilled, hands-on intervention performed by the therapist. It must address a specific functional problem, such as joint restriction, soft-tissue limitation, or mobility loss.
Payers expect manual therapy to serve a purpose beyond comfort. If the technique does not contribute to measurable improvement or functional progression, reimbursement becomes difficult to defend.
This step matters because payers assume intent. If the service looks routine or interchangeable with other treatments, it will be priced that way.
During the session, manual therapy time must be separate and uninterrupted from other billable services. This is critical. If manual therapy overlaps with exercise, neuromuscular reeducation, or therapeutic activities, payers may consider it a duplication of services.
Documentation should clearly describe:
Avoid generic statements. Instead of writing that manual therapy was provided, describe what was done and why it was necessary for that patient on that day.
From a payer’s perspective, specificity signals skill. Vague language signals padding.
CPT 97140 is time-based, and time drives units. That makes this step one of the most important.
Manual therapy minutes must be recorded independently from other services. If 12 minutes were spent on manual therapy and 15 on therapeutic exercise, those minutes cannot be blended or averaged.
For Medicare and Medicare-aligned plans, apply the 8-minute rule. For many commercial payers, full 15-minute increments may apply. Payer must verify this difference.
Payers rarely question the technique. They ask the time.
Once time is confirmed, convert minutes into billable units correctly. Overbilling even a single unit can trigger a denial or audit. Underbilling leaves revenue on the table.
This is where many practices quietly lose money. Units are often guessed instead of calculated. Payers expect math, not estimates.
Units should always reflect documented time. If documentation and units do not match, the payer assumes the units are wrong.
Payers do not pay for services in isolation. They pay for services that make sense for the diagnosis.
Each unit of CPT 97140 must be supported by an ICD-10 code that explains why manual therapy was medically necessary. Joint mobilization for mobility loss. Soft tissue work for muscle restriction—lymphatic drainage for edema.
If the diagnosis does not logically support the service, payment is at risk, even if time and technique are perfect.
This is where clinical reasoning becomes a form of protection against reimbursement.
When CPT 97140 is billed with other active therapy codes, modifiers often determine whether payment happens at all.
Modifier 59 or an appropriate X-modifier communicates to the payer that manual therapy was separate and distinct, not duplicative. Without it, many payer systems automatically bundle the service and deny payment.
Modifiers are not optional signals. They are instructions to payer systems.
Using the wrong modifier is just as damaging as using none at all.
Before the claim goes out, everything must align.
This step is often skipped, and it is where most preventable denials originate.
A clean claim does not start at the clearinghouse. It begins with a review.
Once submitted, the job is not finished. Payment must be reviewed carefully.
Check:
If CPT 97140 is consistently reduced or denied, the issue usually stems from documentation patterns, not payer bias.
Patterns tell the story payers are seeing.
Explanation of Benefits statements are feedback tools. They show how the payer interpreted your billing choices.
Smart practices use EOBs to adjust:
This step turns billing from reactive to strategic.
CPT 97140 is one of the most denied manual therapy codes, not because therapists do the service wrong, but because it is often billed carelessly. Most denials happen for the same repeat reasons. Understanding these mistakes helps you stop revenue loss before it starts.
One of the most common problems is billing CPT 97140 without clearly showing why the service was needed. Payers do not pay for hands-on time alone. They pay for skilled treatment that addresses a functional problem. When documentation fails to connect manual therapy to a specific impairment, payers view it as comfort care.
How to avoid it
Manual therapy is often performed alongside therapeutic exercise or neuromuscular reeducation. The mistake happens when time overlaps or is not clearly separated. Payers assume overlap means duplication and deny one of the services.
How to avoid it
Many practices lose money or invite audits by guessing units instead of calculating them. One extra unit or one missing unit can trigger payer scrutiny, especially under Medicare rules.
How to avoid it
When CPT 97140 is billed with other active therapy codes, missing modifiers often cause automatic denials. Payers assume services were not distinct unless told otherwise.
How to avoid it
Statements such as “manual therapy performed” do not protect against reimbursement. Payers expect to see skill, technique, and intent. Generic notes make CPT 97140 look routine and unskilled.
How to avoid it
Even when manual therapy is appropriate, claims fail when the diagnosis does not support the service. Payers reject services that do not logically align with the ICD-10 code.
How to avoid it
Some practices bill CPT 97140 on nearly every visit. This raises red flags. Payers expect progression toward active treatment, not dependence on passive techniques.
How to avoid it
Not all payers follow the same rules for CPT 97140. Medicare, commercial plans, and workers’ compensation may each handle it differently. Treating all payers the same leads to preventable denials.
How to avoid it
Payers expect improvement. If notes show the same findings visit after visit, they assume the service is no longer effective or necessary.
How to avoid it
Many practices fix single denials but ignore patterns. When CPT 97140 is repeatedly reduced or denied, the issue usually lies in how it is being billed, not in payer bias.
How to avoid it
CPT code 97140 is not tricky to bill, but it is easy to misrepresent. The difference lies in whether the documentation speaks the payer’s language.
When time, technique, and medical necessity are clearly separated and explained, reimbursement is predictable. When they are assumed, payment becomes inconsistent.
Getting CPT 97140 right is not about learning new rules.
It is about making your clinical intent visible to the payer.
And when that happens, denials stop being mysterious, and reimbursement becomes routine.
CPT 97140 should be a steady revenue driver, not a denial risk. If your claims are getting reduced, delayed, or denied, the problem is rarely the care you provide. It is how that care is captured, coded, and billed.
Medix Revenue Group helps therapy and specialty practices tighten documentation, clean up modifier usage, align billing with payer rules, and recover revenue lost to avoidable errors. We look at where your claims break down and fix the process before payers do it for you.
Contact Us Now for Accurate Billing and Faster Reimbursements.